HBWeekly

Top Pool Builders in Texas: September 2026

Posted on October 9, 2026 by Erika Carruth

September may be the unofficial start of “pumpkin‑spice season,” but for Texas pool builders, it marked something a bit less festive: a noticeable cooldown in new swimming pool construction. According to the latest HBW reports, 427 new pool permits were added to the database statewide in September 2026—representing approximately $31.4 million in new construction value. That’s a 25% month‑over‑month decline, a reminder that even in a state where summer feels like a year‑round event, the pool market still has its seasonal rhythms.

Today, we will break down the top pool builders across Texas’s four major metro areas (Dallas, Houston, Austin, and San Antonio), highlighting who pulled the most permits, who led in total and average construction value, and what the given patterns reveal about the nature of pool construction in the Lone Star State. Construction professionals rely on permit data to keep a finger on the pulse of the market, and the figures from September tell a story worth reviewing.

Unlike residential homebuilding, where statewide giants often dominate multiple markets, pool construction tends to be a regional sport. Local soil conditions, municipal permitting processes, and even neighborhood architectural norms influence which builders thrive in which areas. The result? A patchwork of regional leaders rather than a single statewide champion. That being stated, a few names (ex: Cody Pools) manage to appear across multiple markets, offering a glimpse into which leading companies have successfully scaled beyond their home turf.

Dallas: 167 New Permits, Avg. Value $76,022

Dallas led the state in total new pool permits for September, and its top builders reflect a mix of established regional players and one notable anomaly.

Top Builders by Permit Volume

Permit Office Will Not Provide – 17 permits | $1,184,417 total | $69,672 avg
Riverbend Pools – 9 permits | $521,000 total | $57,889 avg
Accent Pools – 7 permits | $315,000 total | $45,000 avg
Pinnacle Pools – 6 permits | $662,109 total | $110,352 avg
Venture Custom Pools – 6 permits | $416,000 total | $69,333 avg

A Quick Note on “Permit Office Will Not Provide” – Such a label appears when a permitting office does not disclose the contractor name; this may be due to privacy policies, incomplete filings, or administrative backlog. While the name is missing, the permit count and valuation still matter, especially when the unidentified entity holds over 10% of all Dallas permits for the month. Including them keeps the data honest and the market picture complete.

Pinnacle Pools led Dallas out of the top five with a higher average project value at an impressive $110,352, while the unnamed entity—listed as “permit office will not provide”—claimed the largest share of total permits, accounting for just over 10% of all new pool activity in the region. Meanwhile, mid‑tier builders such as Riverbend, Accent, and Venture Custom Pools collectively contributed 22 permits, representing roughly 13% of Dallas’s total volume. The region continues to show a healthy spread of builders with moderate concentrations of activity, suggesting a competitive and diverse market.

Houston: 144 New Permits, Avg. Value $78,972

The Houston market is often dynamic, and the data from September reflects a mix of established companies and one interesting outlier.

Top Builders by Permit Volume

Anthony & Sylvan Pools – 9 permits | $532,000 total | $59,111 avg
Jimoh Moruf – 8 permits | $400,000 total | $50,000 avg
Avree Pools – 5 permits | $487,000 total | $97,400 avg
Blue Haven Pools – 5 permits | $258,000 total | $51,600 avg
Southern Charm Pools – 4 permits | $410,000 total | $102,500 avg

The Consultant Factor – The #2 spot—held by Jimoh Moruf—is likely a consultant or permit expediter filing on behalf of multiple builders. This is not uncommon in Houston’s fast‑moving market. Even so, the concentration of permits under one filer provides insight into where construction activity is clustering, regardless of the filing structure.

Out of the top five pool builders, Southern Charm Pools led Houston in average project value at an impressive $102,500, while Anthony & Sylvan Pools secured the largest share of permits for the month, accounting for roughly 6.25% of all new pool activity in the region. At the same time, Avree Pools emerged as a strong value leader, generating nearly half a million dollars in total construction value from just five permits—a notable concentration that highlights the company’s ability to deliver higher‑end projects even at lower volume. Together, the dynamics provide a picture of a Houston market where both permit distribution and project valuation reveal a competitive mix of established builders and high‑value specialists.

Austin: 90 New Permits, Avg. Value $63,596

The pool market in Austin continues to be shaped by a few standout regional leaders, most notably Cody Pools, which also appears in San Antonio’s top five.

Top Builders by Permit Volume

Cody Pools – 8 permits | $443,700 total | $55,463 avg
Denali Pools – 7 permits | $448,700 total | $64,100 avg
Waterview Pools – 6 permits | $703,000 total | $117,167 avg
Aquamarine Pools of Texas – 5 permits | $247,800 total | $49,560 avg
Avery Building Company – 5 permits | $175,000 total | $35,000 avg

Waterview Pools led Austin’s top five in average project value at an impressive $117,167. Meanwhile, Cody Pools secured the largest share of permits at 8.9% of all Austin activity, reinforcing its role as a consistent regional leader. Together, these figures highlight a market where high‑value specialists and high‑volume operators each play distinct but influential roles in shaping Austin’s construction landscape for the month.

San Antonio: 26 New Permits, Avg. Value $62,731

San Antonio had the lowest permit volume of the four metros, but its average value remained close to Austin’s—showing that while fewer pools were built, they weren’t necessarily bargain‑basement projects.

Top Builders by Permit Volume

All top five builders pulled exactly 2 permits each:

Fun N Sun Pools of Austin – $209,000 total | $104,500 avg
Gary Pools SA – $115,000 total | $57,500 avg
Argo Construction – $100,000 total | $50,000 avg
Cody Pools – $100,000 total | $50,000 avg
Fiberglass Pools of Texas – $100,000 total | $50,000 avg

Fun N Sun Pools led the San Antonio top five in average project value at $104,500, standing out in a month where permit activity was evenly distributed across all builders. In fact, no company pulled more than two permits, creating an unusually uniform landscape in which even builders ranked sixth through eighth matched the same permit count. This lack of differentiation underscores just how level the playing field was in San Antonio last month, with no clear frontrunners and a market defined more by consistency than competition.

Statewide Takeaways

Across all four metros, a few themes emerge:

1. Concentration Is Low Statewide – No single builder holds more than 10% of statewide permits. Even the highest regional performers (ex: Cody Pools or Anthony & Sylvan) represent small slices of the total 427 permits.

2. Average Values Vary Widely – Houston posted the highest regional average value at $78,972, setting the benchmark for overall project pricing across Texas in September. At the builder level, Waterview Pools in Austin stood out with the highest average project value statewide at $117,167, demonstrating a strong emphasis on premium, high‑end builds. On the opposite end of the spectrum, Avery Building Company (also in Austin) recorded the lowest average value at $35,000, highlighting just how wide the spread can be between luxury‑focused firms and more budget‑conscious operators.

3. Regional Identity Matters – Pool construction is deeply local. The result is a market where regional specialists thrive, and statewide dominance is rare.

4. September Was a Cooling Month – A 25% statewide decline suggests seasonal slowdown, economic caution, or simply a pause before Q4 activity picks back up. It is important to remember that this is a monthly snapshot, offering less of a grand declaration and more of a quick glimpse of market activity as it unfolded last month.

For construction professionals, the latest permit insights offer a valuable view of market momentum, competitive positioning, and regional demand patterns. And while the temperatures may finally be dropping, the Lone Star State’s appetite for backyard oases remains as strong, and as regionally distinct as ever.

To gain more information on the builders, homeowners and permits for the construction activity above, check out HBW for your copy of the latest construction data reports. To gain access to the HBW database and receive custom and detailed reports on the latest residential and commercial building activity in Florida, Georgia, Texas, Alabama, and Oklahoma, please contact HBW for details.

Using Building Permits to Identify Your Ideal Customer Profile (ICP)

Posted on October 7, 2026 by Erika Carruth

*A brief look into segmentation for contractors who are ready to stop “marketing in the dark” and start aiming with precision.*

If you have been in the construction industry for more than five minutes, you already know that marketing can feel a bit like tossing business cards into the wind and hoping one lands in the right driveway. It’s tempting to send the same message to everyone—after all, you’re busy, you’re juggling projects, and segmentation sounds like something reserved for people who have time to alphabetize their spice racks. But here’s the truth contractors eventually discover: reaching more people doesn’t mean reaching the right people. And reaching the wrong people with the wrong message at the wrong time is the fastest route to the junk folder, the blocked caller list, or the recycling bin.

Segmentation shouldn’t be perceived as a luxury reserved for people with excess time; it is useful and beneficial to everyone with a list of contacts. When you take the time to define your Ideal Customer Profile (ICP) and tailor your outreach accordingly, you stop spinning wheels and start gaining traction. And one of the most powerful, underused tools for doing this is building permit data—especially when sourced from a comprehensive, up‑to‑date provider like HBW. For this reason, we are going to take a little time to walk through how to use permit data to sharpen your ICP, refine your messaging, and prioritize the leads that actually move the needle.

Customer Profile (ICP) Defining Your Ideal

It sounds technical and complicated, but it can be quite easy if you do it correctly. Your ICP is not simply “homeowners who need work.” That would be akin to saying your ideal project is “anything with lumber.” Technically true, but wildly unhelpful. A strong ICP is specific, behavior‑based, and rooted in real patterns (not guesses). Permit data gives you visibility into those patterns, and instead of imagining who your best customers might be, you can see who they actually are.

So where do you begin? You can start by examining the types of projects that have been historically profitable for you. Are kitchen remodels your bread and butter? Do you thrive on additions? Are roofing replacements your fastest close? Permit data enables you to identify homeowners who are already investing in specific project types, in the neighborhoods where you have had the most success, at the price points that align with your margins. This means that your ICP is measurable, trackable, and refreshable.

Tailoring Messaging to Different Project Types

Once you know your ideal customer profile, the next step is speaking to them in a way that resonates. While it may be obvious, it is worth stating that a homeowner pulling a permit for a pool enclosure does not need the same message as someone planning a second‑story addition. They have different motivations, timelines, budgets, and concerns.

Permit data reveals the projects that homeowners are undertaking, as well as when they are planning to start. Such details allow you to tailor your messaging with surgical precision. For example:

A homeowner who just filed a roofing permit may respond best to messaging about durability, weather protection, and long‑term savings.
Someone planning a major remodel may be more interested in design expertise and project management.
A homeowner adding square footage may care most about structural integrity and resale value.

When your messaging aligns with the project type, you stop sounding like the many contractors who have probably reached out to them and start sounding like the contractor who understands exactly what they need.

Prioritizing High‑Value Leads

This goes without saying but not all leads are created equal. Some are tire‑kickers. Some are price‑shoppers, and some are wonderful people who will absolutely call you back… someday… maybe… if the stars align. Permit data helps you identify the leads worth pursuing now. By analyzing project size, frequency, and historical patterns, you can determine which homeowners are most likely to convert, as well as which ones will generate the highest lifetime value.

For example, homeowners who consistently pull permits for upgrades tend to invest in their properties over time; they are most likely not one‑and‑done customers. Likewise, neighborhoods with high permit activity often indicate strong economic stability and a willingness to invest in home improvement.

By identifying and prioritizing leads, you can develop a more strategic approach to outreach. This means no more chasing leads because they “seemed nice.” You can focus on the ones that statistically align with your ICP and your business goals.

How Permit Data Reveals Patterns in Homeowner Behavior

So this is a big one… how permit data provides real and practical information about the prospect. In short, permit data is one of the most revealing sources of insight a contractor can use because it functions almost like a behavioral diary of a homeowner’s investment habits. When you study permit activity over time, you begin to see how frequently a homeowner takes on projects, the kinds of improvements they gravitate toward, and where their focus leans (upgrades, repairs, or full‑scale expansions). You can observe how quickly they move from filing a permit to breaking ground, which often (but not always) signals their level of urgency and decisiveness. You can even get a sense of whether they prefer to hire professionals or attempt DIY work based on the nature and complexity of the permits they file.

Such details combine to paint a picture of what the homeowner is doing, and how they are doing it. A homeowner who consistently invests in cosmetic improvements is usually motivated by aesthetics and lifestyle, while someone concentrating on structural changes may be preparing for resale or long‑term stability. And when you see multiple permits filed in rapid succession, it can be an indicator of a major transformation underway—one that may require additional services or complementary work. This level of behavioral insight is highly valuable to your marketing efforts because it allows you to craft messaging that speaks directly to a homeowner’s motivations rather than simply the project at hand, creating a far more compelling connection.

Identifying Your Most Profitable Customer Segments

When it comes to potential profits, don’t let the size of a project fool you; profitability is less about project size and more about efficiency, repeatability, and alignment with your strengths. Permit data can help you identify segments where your business naturally excels, ensuring that you are not “stretching” beyond your capacity.

As you study permit trends over time, you might discover that homeowners in certain ZIP codes consistently gravitate toward premium materials, signaling both higher budgets and a preference for elevated finishes. You may notice that particular project types naturally lend themselves to profitable upsells, creating opportunities to expand the scope of work without feeling sales‑driven. Some neighborhoods may even reveal a pattern of aging homes that require ongoing improvements, making them fertile ground for long‑term customer relationships. Other demographic pockets can exhibit a strong inclination toward energy‑efficient upgrades, reflecting both environmental values and a willingness to invest in modern systems. When you take everything into account, your Ideal Customer Profile becomes far more refined. Instead of the broad and vague “homeowners needing remodels,” you begin to see a much more precise segment—perhaps homeowners in mid‑century neighborhoods who are actively investing in structural enhancements and energy‑efficient improvements. Such specificity elevates your marketing from broad strokes to something closer to fine craftsmanship, where every message is shaped has a purpose.

A little bit of segmentation can go a long way. By using building permit data (especially high‑quality, current data from a source like HBW), you can have clarity, precision, and confidence in your outreach, going from guessing to knowing.

And yes, the process of segmentation and defining your ICP takes a little time, but so does redoing a poorly poured slab. The payoff is worth it.

Permit data gives you the ability to reach the right customers, with the right message, at the right time. It helps you define who you serve best, tailor your communication to their needs, and prioritize the leads that will actually grow your business. In an industry where craftsmanship matters, your marketing deserves the same level of care, and once you start using permit data to guide your ICP, you will wonder how you ever marketed without it.

For more information on construction business marketing tips, stay connected with the HBW Blog. To get ahead of construction activity and gain access to the latest permitting data in Florida, Texas, Georgia, Alabama and Oklahoma, contact HBW for more information on construction data reports and industry leads.

Marketing Mistakes Contractors Should Avoid (And What to Do Instead)

Posted on October 2, 2026 by Erika Carruth

Contractors are no strangers to the grind. You juggle job sites, crews, materials, weather delays, and the occasional client who swears they “measured it themselves.” With all that noise, marketing can feel like one more item on a very long punch list—something you’ll “get to when things slow down,” which, of course, they never do.

But here’s the truth every contractor eventually bumps into: even the best craftsmanship can’t compensate for marketing that isn’t pulling its weight. And while shortcuts are tempting—generic messaging, sporadic follow‑ups, old lead lists that have been sitting around longer than a forgotten pallet of pavers—those shortcuts drain time, money, and momentum.

The good news is that avoiding these pitfalls doesn’t require a full rebrand or a marketing department staffed like a Fortune 500 company. It just requires a move toward smarter, more intentional habits that actually support growth rather than sabotage it.

The Trap of Generic Messaging

Most contractors have seen generic marketing in the wild: “Quality Work at a Great Price,” “Your Trusted Local Contractor,” or the ever‑popular “No Job Too Big or Too Small.” Such phrases are so common that they have become wallpaper—present, but invisible. And while the statements may be true, the issue is that such statements don’t differentiate you enough from the competition. Homeowners and commercial clients are inundated with contractor ads, and when everyone sounds the same, no one stands out. For this reason, it is important to lean into specificity; this can look like talking about the types of projects where you excel, the materials you prefer, the timelines you consistently hit, or the unique processes your team uses. For example, if you specialize in energy‑efficient retrofits, say so. If your remodels are known for meticulous finish work, highlight it.

Specificity builds trust and signals expertise, while also giving your audience something to remember you by that goes beyond just “great service.”

The Issue with Inconsistent Follow‑Ups

Contractors often underestimate how much business is lost simply because follow‑up fell through the cracks. The scenario may sound familiar: you send a quote, get pulled into a site visit, then a supplier calls, then a crew needs direction, and suddenly it’s been two weeks and the lead has gone cold. And this is often not due to the prospect lacking interest, but rather because they may have assumed you are no longer interested. Communication is key, and consistent follow-up is a big part of the picture.

So, what does consistent follow-up look like? Well, it certainly doesn’t look like pestering people. It looks more like showing professionalism, reliability, and respect for their time. Consider a simple rhythm—one follow‑up within 48 hours, another within a week, and a final check‑in after that—keeps you top‑of‑mind without overwhelming anyone.

And yes, automation tools can help, but even a calendar reminder or a dedicated “lead follow‑up hour” each week can transform your close rate.

Outdated Lead Lists: The Silent Budget Killer

If there’s one marketing mistake that quietly drains budgets across the construction industry, it is relying on old or incomplete lead sources. And while this may seem obvious, the truth is that contact lists and leads can become outdated quickly—time flies.

Contractors often inherit lead lists from previous campaigns, buy generic homeowner databases, or keep recycling contacts from earlier years. The issue is that construction demand is dynamic. People move. Projects get completed. Properties change hands. And outdated lists lead to wasted spend—ads shown to the wrong people, mailers sent to addresses where no one is planning a project, and outreach efforts that never had a chance.

This is where permit‑based leads change the game. Building permits are real‑time indicators of who is actively planning construction work. They are not guesses, not outdated homeowner lists, not “maybe someday” prospects. They are concrete signals of intent. By using permit data, you can reduce risk and eliminate the guesswork. You are not marketing to a broad audience hoping that someone might need you; you are marketing to people who already do.

Using Permit Data the Right Way

As I have mentioned in previous posts: Permit data is a powerful tool; that being stated, its power lies in being current, accurate, and easy to work. This is one of the many reasons why contractors turn to HBW for the latest building permit information—because fresh data means better targeting, better timing, and better results.

But the real magic happens when you integrate permit data into your broader marketing strategy. Use it to tailor your messaging (“We specialize in the type of addition you’re planning”), to time your outreach (“We saw your permit was recently approved—here’s how we can help you move forward”), and to prioritize your follow‑ups (“This homeowner is actively progressing their project; let’s reach out again this week”). While permit‑based leads don’t replace good marketing habits, they certainly can amplify them. Using them properly will make your messaging more relevant, your follow‑ups more strategic, and your marketing spend more efficient.

Building a Smarter, More Sustainable Marketing Engine

There is no one-size-fits-all marketing method, and perfection is a myth. Contractors need marketing that works, and that starts with avoiding the traps that slow growth: generic messaging, inconsistent follow‑ups, and outdated lead lists. By focusing on specificity, reliability, and data‑driven targeting, you can create a marketing engine that feels less like guesswork and more like craftsmanship—precise and built to last.

And while shortcuts will always be tempting (we’ve all been there), the contractors who rise above the noise are the ones who choose the smarter path. They are the ones who invest in fresh permit data, who follow up with care, and speak clearly about what makes them different.

Marketing may occasionally feel like a burden, but it is far more manageable than it seems. With the right tools and the right habits, a solid marketing strategy will be one of the most powerful assets your business has to move forward and be successful.

Florida’s Residential Construction Leaders – August 2026

Posted on September 30, 2026 by Erika Carruth

Last week, we took a look and shared data from the latest building permits on record in Florida for August, at which time we noted that the state posted 7,842 new residential construction permits, a 28% month‑over‑month increase, with an estimated $2.9 billion in total construction value. For construction professionals, this kind of surge can be a strategic data point, as permit activity is one of the clearest indicators of market velocity, competitive positioning, and pricing pressure.

Today, we are using the same reports to identify the builders behind the monthly boom. Across five major regions—Tampa, Southwest Florida, Orlando, Jacksonville, and Southeast Florida—we are highlighting the top five builders per market, identifying statewide leaders, and noting where builders are flexing their muscles across multiple metros.

Statewide Titans: The Big Three

Before we zoom into each region, it is worth acknowledging the statewide heavyweights—those builders whose permit activity consistently dominates across Florida:

Lennar Homes (864 permits)
D.R. Horton (829 permits)
Pulte Homes (659 permits)

The above listed leading three appeared in the top five of every major region (with the exception of D.R. Horton in the Southeast), and they led the state in total permit volume for August 2026. Their multi‑market presence underscores their operational scale, land position strength, and ability to maintain production velocity even in fluctuating market conditions. That being stated, there are other home builders that are highly active and leading in certain areas; for this reason, here is a closer look at the leaders within each region:

Tampa – 2,170 Permits

Tampa continues to be one of Florida’s most active residential markets, and August was no exception.

Top Builders

Lennar Homes – 257 permits Total value: $83.8M | Avg value: $326K | The highest permit count in the Tampa area.
D.R. Horton – 229 permits Total value: $58.4M | Avg value: $255K
The Villages of Lake Sumter – 144 permits Total value: $25.2M | Avg value: $175K
Pulte Homes – 96 permits Total value: $40.4M | Avg value: $421K | The highest average value in Tampa out of the top five builders.
Ryan Homes – 74 permits Total value: $18.7M | Avg value: $252K

Lennar Homes dominated volume, while Pulte Homes dominated average value, and Tampa continues to be a battleground for the state’s largest production builders.

Southwest Florida – 1,911 Permits

Southwest Florida remains a powerhouse for new construction, with three major builders neck‑and‑neck on the leaderboard.

Top Builders

D.R. Horton – 238 permits Total value: $50.2M | Avg value: $211K
Lennar Homes – 208 permits Total value: $44.6M | Avg value: $214K
Pulte Homes – 205 permits Total value: $48.8M | Avg value: $238K
Neal Communities of SW FL – 76 permits Total value: $27.6M | Avg value: $364K | The highest average value in the region out of the top five builders.
Taylor Morrison – 71 permits Total value: $15.6M | Avg value: $220K

The top three—D.R. Horton, Lennar, and Pulte—are separated by only 33 permits. Last month was a tight race, and Neal Communities stands out with premium‑value builds.

Orlando – 1,443 Permits

The market in Orlando continued to show strong demand, with Pulte Homes taking a notable lead.

Top Builders

Pulte Homes – 187 permits Total value: $68.9M | Avg value: $368K
D.R. Horton – 136 permits Total value: $46.3M | Avg value: $340K
Lennar Homes – 125 permits Total value: $38.6M | Avg value: $308K
KB Homes – 78 permits Total value: $23.9M | Avg value: $307K
Stanley Martin Homes – 61 permits Total value: $26.0M | Avg value: $425K | The highest average value in Orlando out of the top five builders.

Pulte Homes led in both volume and total value, while Stanley Martin captured the high‑end segment and held the highest average value of construction out of the top five builders in the region for the one-month period.

Jacksonville – 1,291 Permits

The Jacksonville area remained competitive last month, with Lennar Homes and D.R. Horton leading the charge.

Top Builders

Lennar Homes – 168 permits Total value: $33.9M | Avg value: $202K
D.R. Horton – 158 permits Total value: $41.3M | Avg value: $262K
KB Homes – 69 permits Total value: $13.8M | Avg value: $200K
Pulte Homes – 66 permits Total value: $21.8M | Avg value: $330K
Dream Finders Construction – 62 permits Total value: $18.9M | Avg value: $305K

Lennar Homes led in volume, but D.R. Horton took the lead in terms of total value. Pulte Homes and Dream Finders Construction pushed the average value even higher, signaling strong mid‑to‑upper‑tier activity.

Southeast Florida – 1,027 Permits

Last month, Southeast Florida reflected a more diversified builder landscape, with GL Building Corporation and Minto Communities joining the usual statewide leaders.

Top Builders

Lennar Homes – 106 permits Total value: $29.7M | Avg value: $281K
Pulte Homes – 105 permits Total value: $52.6M | Avg value: $501K | The highest average value statewide out of the top five builders.
GL Building Corporation – 98 permits Total value: $42.7M | Avg value: $436K
Minto Communities – 80 permits Total value: $19.8M | Avg value: $247K
CBI Construction Services – 73 permits Total value: $17.2M | Avg value: $235K

In the southeast, Pulte Home’s average value was unmatched by any builder listed in the top five across all regions, and GL Building Corporation exhibited a strong performance in the high‑value segment.

The data for August shows a market that is accelerating, competitive, and increasingly segmented by product type and price point. Builders with multi‑region dominance are leveraging scale, while regional players are carving out high‑value niches. For industry professionals—from suppliers to subcontractors to developers—the latest data helps forecast workload, negotiate pricing, and identify emerging opportunities. And in a market as dynamic as Florida, staying ahead of the permit curve is half the battle.

Florida Swimming Pool Construction Report – August 2026

Posted on September 25, 2026 by Erika Carruth

If Florida’s swimming pool construction market had a personality, August 2026 suggests it’s feeling a bit — maybe even a little sun‑kissed. According to the latest HBW construction data, 2,765 new swimming pool permits were added to the database last month, representing more than $222 million in total construction value across the state’s five major regions: Southwest, Southeast, Tampa, Orlando, and Jacksonville; this figure reflects a 30% month‑over‑month increase from July. And yes, before anyone starts celebrating like it’s peak season at the swim club, it’s worth remembering that the market has been in a bit of a rhythmic pattern lately. June saw a 20% MoM increase from May, and July took a 14% MoM dip. In other words, August appears to be part of a natural ebb and flow as of late, a reminder that construction markets breathe just like the rest of us.

Still, the figures from last month are strong, and they offer valuable insight for construction professionals who rely on permit data to understand market conditions, benchmark performance, and anticipate regional demand. So, let’s take a dive into the regional breakdown:

Southwest Florida

With 984 permits, Southwest Florida held a substantial lead in the pack. This region alone accounted for over 35% of all new pool permits statewide, making it the undisputed epicenter of August’s pool‑building enthusiasm.

Total Value: $79,320,202
Average Value: $80,610
Top Counties for Total Permits: Manatee County (244 permits | Total Value: $22,611,313); Lee County (395 permits | Total Value: $28,054,497)

The average value of construction in the southwestern region sits comfortably above the statewide mid‑range, and its sheer volume underscores a region where demand remains consistently strong. Lee County, in particular, continues to behave like a construction engine that refuses to idle.

Southeast Florida

The Southeast region posted 583 permits, contributing a healthy portion of statewide activity and maintaining its reputation for high‑value residential construction.

Total Value: $44,171,260
Average Value: $75,765
Top Counties for Total Permits: Palm Beach County (224 permits | Total Value: $19,780,300); Miami‑Dade County (134 permits | Total Value: $7,286,973)

Southeast Florida’s average value lands below the southwestern region, but still robust. Palm Beach County continues to be a reliable driver of upscale pool construction — no surprise there — while Miami‑Dade’s figures reflect steady but more modest growth.

Tampa

Tampa posted 569 permits, placing it just behind Southeast in total volume but ahead in average value.

Total Value: $46,566,765
Average Value: $81,840
Top Counties for Total Permits: Hillsborough County: (163 permits |Total Value: $16,428,445); Sumter County (125 permits | Total Value: $5,625,000)

With a higher average value than most regions, Tampa’s market continues to exhibit strong investment per project. Hillsborough remains the region’s anchor, while Sumter county’s activity may be more reflective of ongoing suburban expansion.

Orlando

Orlando contributed 387 permits, a moderate figure compared to the coastal giants but still a meaningful part of the statewide picture.

Total Value: $28,716,431
Average Value: $74,203
Top Counties for Total Permits: Lake County (112 permits | Total Value: $6,598,872); Brevard County (99 permits | Total Value: $8,439,653)

The average value of pool construction in Orlando is slightly lower than Southeast, but lands as the lowest average value for the month. The region remains steady, and Brevard County’s total value is notably strong relative to its permit count, suggesting higher‑end projects or more complex builds.

Jacksonville

Jacksonville may have posted the lowest total number of permits (242 permits), but it also claimed the highest average value statewide.

Total Value: $23,359,694
Average Value: $96,528
Top Counties: Duval County (60 permits | Total Value: $5,775,594); St. Johns County (108 permits | Total Value: $10,255,984)

With an average value approaching six figures, swimming pool projects in the Jacksonville area are clearly leaning toward premium builds. St. Johns County continues to be a standout, reflecting strong residential growth and higher‑end construction trends.

Statewide Highlights and Market Takeaways

Southwest Florida led the state in new pool construction for August, pulling 984 permits and accounting for more than 35 percent of all activity, with the Southeast and Tampa regions following closely behind at 583 and 569 permits, respectively. While Jacksonville posted the lowest volume, it distinguished itself with the highest average value at $96,528, suggesting a concentration of more complex or luxury‑tier projects. Orlando, on the other hand, recorded the lowest average value at $74,203, though still well within healthy market expectations. When looking at overall concentration, Southwest, Southeast, and Tampa formed the core trio of high‑activity regions, while Jacksonville and Orlando represented the lighter end of the spectrum in terms of total permit volume.

Monthly permit data is a powerful tool, but it is also a snapshot; it tells us what’s happening right now, not necessarily what will happen next quarter or next year. The figures from last month reflect a vibrant market with natural fluctuations, strong regional dynamics, and continued investment in residential amenities. For construction professionals, this report is less a call to action and more a call to awareness. It’s a benchmark, a pulse check, and a reminder that while the market may ebb and flow, Florida’s appetite for new swimming pools remains impressively resilient.

Florida New Residential Construction – August 2026

Posted on September 23, 2026 by Erika Carruth

Florida’s residential construction market decided to stretch its legs a bit in August 2026—and frankly, it was about time. After a couple of steady and consistent months, the Sunshine State posted 7,842 new residential construction permits, marking a month‑over‑month increase of roughly 28%. For construction professionals, that’s not just a number—it’s a pulse check. And in August, the pulse was strong.

Statewide, the total construction value for the month came in at approximately $2.9 billion, based on HBW’s latest residential construction permit data. When we divide that total value by the statewide permit count, we land at an average construction value of about $369,000 per new home. That’s a healthy figure, and as we will review, some regions are pulling that average upward with gusto.

Below is a region‑by‑region breakdown of Florida’s five major markets (Tampa, Southwest, Orlando, Jacksonville, and Southeast), along with insights into where demand is rising, where values are climbing, and which counties are leading the charge.

Tampa

Total Permits: 2,170
Total Value: $711,850,249
Average Value: $328,042

Top Counties: Pasco County (517 permits – Total Value: $215.1M); Polk County (510 permits – Total Value $170.0M)

Tampa once again proved to be a powerhouse for volume. With more than 2,100 permits, it led the state in sheer activity. The counties of Pasco and Polk continue their marathon of growth, each posting over 500 permits. While Tampa’s average value isn’t the highest, its consistency and scale make it one of the most reliable indicators of statewide demand.

Southwest

Total Permits: 1,911
Total Value: $706,827,067
Average Value: $369,873

Top Counties: Manatee County (500 permits – Total Value: $137.5M); Lee County (789 permits – Total Value: $246.7M)

Southwest Florida remains a magnet for new home construction, with Lee County alone posting nearly 800 permits. The region’s average value sits almost exactly at the statewide average, making it a balanced performer with strong volume, solid value, and steady demand.

Orlando

Total Permits: 1,443
Total Value: $547,609,232
Average Value: $379,494

Top Counties: Lake County (360 permits – Total Value: $107.6M); Brevard County (408 permits – Total Value: $175.1M)

Orlando claims the second‑highest average value statewide, coming in at just under $380K. Brevard and Lake counties continue to show robust activity (more than half of the region’s total permits), and the region’s combination of strong values and steady permit volume makes it a standout for builders seeking higher‑value projects without sacrificing demand.

Jacksonville

Total Permits: 1,291
Total Value: $373,054,273
Average Value: $288,965

Top Counties: Duval County (431 permits – Total Value: $83.2M); St. Johns County (338 permits – Total Value: $99.1M)

Jacksonville posted the lowest average value statewide, coming in just under $289K, but don’t let that fool you because this region remains a high‑demand market with strong permit activity. Lower average values often signal affordability-driven growth, which can be a strategic opportunity for builders targeting volume or entry‑level products.

Southeast

Total Permits: 1,027
Total Value: $548,093,981
Average Value: $533,684

Top Counties: St. Lucie County (353 permits – Total Value: $139.3M); Palm Beach County (349 permits – Total Value: $209.5M)

Let’s talk about the Southeast. Because—wow.

With the lowest permit count of the five regions but the highest average value by a massive margin, Southeast Florida posted an average construction value of $533,684. That’s more than $150,000 higher than Orlando, the second‑highest region. Palm Beach County continues to flex its luxury‑market muscles, and St. Lucie’s strong permit count shows that demand isn’t limited to the ultra‑premium segment. In short, the southeastern region is the definition of “fewer homes, bigger budgets.”

Statewide Summary

Total Permits: 7,842
Total Construction Value: ~$2.9 billion
Average Construction Value: ~$369,000

It is important to keep in mind that monthly permit data is a snapshot; it is useful, detailed, and revealing, but never the full story, and last month certainly offered plenty to read between the lines. Demand clearly began to rise again, with a 28 percent month‑over‑month increase that should reassure builders who felt any mid‑summer slowdown tightening around their schedules. Tampa continued to dominate in sheer volume, maintaining its role as the state’s heavyweight champion for anyone chasing scale. Meanwhile, Southeast Florida operated in its own distinct universe, posting sky‑high average values on comparatively lower volume and reminding everyone why luxury construction there so often defies statewide norms. Orlando emerged as a strong contender for higher‑value projects—not quite at Southeast’s stratospheric level, but still well above the statewide average and attractive for builders seeking premium opportunities without the ultra‑luxury price tag. Jacksonville, on the other hand, offered affordability‑driven potential, where lower average values translate into broader buyer pools and faster absorption rates. And rounding out the picture, Southwest Florida remained one of the most balanced markets in the state, combining strong volume, solid values, and consistent county‑level performance that make it a reliable region for both strategic expansion and steady operations.

And remember, monthly data is a pulse check, not a full medical exam. For long-term trends, HBW’s quarterly and annual reports (and especially its archives) are indispensable.

Texas New Swimming Pool Construction Report – August 2026

Posted on September 18, 2026 by Erika Carruth

August in Texas is traditionally a month defined by two things: heat that could fry an egg, and homeowners who suddenly realize that a swimming pool isn’t a luxury—it’s survival equipment. Fortunately for the construction industry, that seasonal urgency translated into a surge of new pool construction permits across the state’s major metro areas.

According to the latest HBW construction data, 584 new swimming pool permits were added to the database in August 2026, representing more than $42.3 million in total construction value. That’s a 31% month‑over‑month increase, a jump that is worth noting, even if just a monthly change.

Earlier this week, we used HBW reports to highlight the top pool builders that were driving new construction in the Lone Star State last month, and today, we are using the same reports to take a closer look at where those permits were pulled, how values compare across regions, and which counties are driving the market. For construction professionals, this is the type of data that keeps your finger firmly on the pulse of the residential pool sector in Texas.

Statewide Snapshot

Total Permits: 584
Total Construction Value: $42.3M+
Month‑over‑Month Growth: 31%
Major Metros Included: Dallas, Houston, Austin, San Antonio

Dallas

Total Permits: 241 Total Value: $19,011,830 Average Value: $78,887

Dallas led the state in total permit volume, accounting for approximately 41% of all new pool permits statewide—a commanding share that underscores the region’s strong residential development activity. Out of the various counties that make up the Dallas area, the following ranked as the top five for total new permits:

Tarrant County: 87 permits | Total Value: $8,821,232
Denton County: 43 permits | Total Value: $3,444,034
Collin County: 51 permits | Total Value: $3,438,900

Tarrant County alone represents 36% of Dallas‑area permits, making it the epicenter of North Texas pool construction for the month. Denton and Collin follow with nearly identical total values, though Collin edges out Denton slightly in permit count. The average construction value in Dallas (nearly $79K) places it among the higher‑value markets statewide. The distribution of permits across three major counties also reflects the region’s ongoing suburban expansion—where backyard pools are practically a standard feature.

Houston

Total Permits: 177 Total Value: $14,010,404 Average Value: $79,155

Houston came in second in total permit volume, representing approximately 30% of statewide activity. And while Dallas had the highest count, Houston actually posted the highest average value of all four metros—just edging Dallas by a few hundred dollars. From a county perspective, there were a couple (mostly Harris) that carried the majority of new construction:

Harris County: 130 permits | Total Value: $9,737,404
Galveston County: 20 permits | Total Value: $2,007,000

Harris County captured a massive 73% of all Houston‑area permits, making it the undisputed heavyweight of pool construction in area. Galveston, while a distant second, still posted a respectable $2M in value—proof that coastal homeowners enjoy more than just ocean views. The high average value in Houston suggests larger or more feature‑rich pool projects—think integrated spas, water features, and maybe a tanning ledge or two. The concentration in Harris County also reflects dense urban and suburban demand.

Austin

Total Permits: 113 Total Value: $6,072,732 Average Value: $53,741

Austin accounted for just over 19% of statewide permits, but its average value was the lowest of all four metros. This isn’t necessarily a sign of smaller pools—it may reflect more modest designs or tighter lot configurations in urban infill areas. When looking at the counties where construction was taking place, there was a singular standout:

Travis County: 98 permits | Total Value: $5,219,600

A remarkable 87% of all Austin‑area permits were pulled in Travis County. In other words, Austin’s pool market is essentially Austin—with surrounding counties contributing minimally this month. The area’s lower average value may indicate a trend toward compact, modern pools—clean lines, plunge designs, and efficient footprints that suit the city’s architectural preferences.

San Antonio

Total Permits: 53 Total Value: $3,214,200 Average Value: $60,645

San Antonio represented 9% of statewide activity, making it the smallest of the four markets in August. However, its average value sits comfortably above Austin’s, suggesting mid‑range pool projects with solid feature sets. From a county perspective, the bulk of all new construction took place in two counties:

Bexar County: 35 permits | Total Value: $2,349,800
Guadalupe County: 14 permits | Total Value: $724,400

Bexar County accounted for 66% of San Antonio‑area permits, with Guadalupe contributing a smaller but still meaningful share. Overall, San Antonio’s pool market remains steady but modest, and actually reflects some growth with a month-over-month increase. Growth in the area tends to follow new‑home development corridors, particularly in Bexar and Guadalupe.

Regional Comparisons & Key Takeaways

When comparing the four major metro areas, Dallas clearly stands out as the powerhouse of new swimming pool construction for August 2026. With 241 permits, it accounted for roughly forty‑one percent of all new pool activity statewide, reinforcing its role as the state’s most active and broadly distributed market. Houston followed as a strong second, contributing thirty percent of total permits and distinguishing itself with the highest average project value of the month. Its slightly higher price point suggests a trend toward larger or more feature‑rich pool builds, particularly concentrated in Harris County, which alone produced more permits than any other county in Texas.

Austin, while responsible for nineteen percent of statewide permits, demonstrated a very different profile. Its average value was the lowest among the four metros, hinting at smaller, design‑forward projects or more compact lot conditions that naturally limit pool size. Nearly all of Austin’s activity was concentrated in Travis County, making it the most centralized market in the state. San Antonio, meanwhile, represented the smallest share of new pool construction at nine percent. Even so, its average value landed comfortably above Austin’s, suggesting a steady mid‑range market driven primarily by Bexar County, with Guadalupe County contributing a modest but meaningful portion of the monthly activity.

Overall, last month proved to be a strong month for new swimming pool construction across Texas, with a thirty‑one percent month-over-month increase in permits that signals both heightened seasonal demand and broader market momentum. Dallas dominated in sheer volume, Houston led in project value, Austin leaned into compact and modern designs, and San Antonio maintained a somewhat steady and predictable pace. Together, the regional dynamics paint a clear picture of a market that is both active and evolving, shaped by local development patterns, homeowner preferences, and the ever‑present Texas heat that keeps demand reliably high.

Top Texas Pool Builders – August 2026

Posted on September 16, 2026 by Erika Carruth

August 2026 was a solid month for swimming pool construction in Texas. According to the latest HBW reports, 584 new swimming pool construction permits were added to the database, representing more than $42.3 million in total construction value. That’s a 31% month‑over‑month increase, a surge we will dissect more thoroughly in our upcoming statewide market analysis later this week. Today, however, we are zooming in on the builders themselves—the companies (and occasionally the unnamed entities) driving this spike across the four major metro markets: Dallas, Houston, Austin, and San Antonio.

One thing becomes immediately clear: unlike residential homebuilding, where statewide titans dominate multiple regions, pool construction in Texas is a deeply regional sport. And while a few builders do cross regional boundaries, most operate with strong local concentration. Let’s dive into the August 2026 leaderboard…

Dallas (241 Permits)

Dallas led the state in total pool permits, accounting for 41% of all new pool construction statewide. The top builders by permit volume are:

Builder	Total Permits	Total Value	Avg. Value
Permit Office Will Not Provide	26	$1,272,000	$48,923
Riverbend Pools	11	$647,000	$58,818
J Caldwell Custom Pools	9	$459,900	$51,100
Pinnacle Pools	8	$747,282	$93,410
Watercrest Pools	7	$1,105,500	$157,929

A quick note on “Permit Office Will Not Provide” – This category appears when a permit office does not disclose the builder’s name. While it may seem mysterious, it’s still essential to include because it reflects actual permit volume and helps maintain accurate rankings. In Dallas, this unnamed entity is technically the top builder of the month with 26 permits—over 10% of all Dallas pool activity.

Last month’s activity for Dallas reveals a market defined by both volume and value dynamics. The unnamed “Permit Office Will Not Provide” category led the region with 26 permits, giving it the highest overall volume despite also posting the lowest average value of the top five builders at $48,923. On the opposite end of the spectrum, Watercrest Pools delivered the highest average value at $157,929 and emerged as the most concentrated high‑value builder, producing fewer projects but commanding premium pricing. Together, such trends illustrate a Dallas market that blends mid‑volume production‑style pool construction with standout luxury builders, creating a diverse and competitive landscape.

Houston (177 Permits)

Houston contributed approximately 30% of statewide pool permits, with a competitive spread among well‑known regional players.

Builder	Total Permits	Total Value	Avg. Value
Platinum Pools	16	$1,363,101	$85,194
Anthony & Sylvan Pools	10	$634,700	$63,470
Blue Haven Pools	7	$389,720	$55,674
Avree Pools	6	$627,000	$104,500
Richard’s Total Backyard	5	$357,000	$71,400

August permit activity in Houston reflects a market where both volume and value play distinct roles. Platinum Pools led the region with 16 permits, accounting for nearly nine percent of all Houston pool construction for the month and underscoring its strong local concentration. At the opposite end of the spectrum, Avree Pools posted the highest average value at $104,500, demonstrating a premium pricing position despite a lower permit count. Blue Haven Pools recorded the lowest average value at $55,674, rounding out the range of project types and price points. Altogether, Houston has exhibited a balanced mix of high‑volume builders and boutique firms delivering higher‑value projects, with Avree Pools standing out as a notable example of luxury‑leaning construction within a competitive regional landscape.

Austin (113 Permits)

Austin accounted for just over 19% of statewide pool permits, with a mix of regional specialists and one notable statewide crossover: Cody Pools.

Builder	Total Permits	Total Value	Avg. Value
Denali Pools	12	$743,700	$61,975
Cody Pools	11	$538,200	$48,927
Golden Hour Pools	7	$301,100	$43,014
Fun N Sun Pools of Austin	4	$692,300	$173,075
Anthony & Sylvan Pools	4	$181,700	$45,425

Austin’s August permit activity reflects a wide spread between volume leaders and high‑value specialists. Denali Pools topped the region with 12 permits, establishing itself as the month’s most active builder. Meanwhile, Fun N Sun Pools delivered the highest average value at an impressive $173,075, signaling a strong luxury segment within the Austin market. At the lower end of the value range, Golden Hour Pools recorded an average of $43,014, highlighting the diversity of project scales across the region. Cody Pools also stood out for its multi‑market presence, appearing in Austin’s top five while simultaneously ranking among San Antonio’s leading builders—an uncommon crossover in a market typically dominated by regional specialists.

San Antonio (53 Permits)

San Antonio represented approximately 9% of statewide pool permits, with a tight competitive field and another strong showing from Cody Pools.

Builder	Total Permits	Total Value	Avg. Value
Cody Pools	6	$550,000	$91,667
Keith Zars Pools	6	$270,000	$45,000
Blue Haven Pools	4	$215,000	$53,750
Premier Pools & Spas	4	$215,000	$53,750
Gary Pools SA	3	$165,000	$55,000

The pool construction activity in San Antonio last month reflects a compact yet competitive market, with Cody Pools and Keith Zars Pools tied for the highest permit volume at six each. Despite sharing the top spot in permit count, their project values diverge significantly: Cody Pools posted the highest average value at $91,667, while Keith Zars Pools recorded the lowest at $45,000. As previously mentioned, Cody Pools also stands out as the most regionally concentrated builder, reinforcing its influence by appearing not only in San Antonio’s rankings but also in Austin’s top five. Altogether, the month’s data shows a tightly focused market where a few key players drive most of the activity, with Cody Pools demonstrating particularly strong regional reach.

Last month proved to be a robust one for Texas pool construction, marked by strong regional activity and a notable statewide surge in permits. While the residential construction market often features statewide titans, the pool industry remains a regional ecosystem, shaped by local demand, climate nuances, and builder specialization. Builders like Cody Pools, Platinum Pools, Denali Pools, and the enigmatic Permit Office Will Not Provide played major roles in driving August’s growth. Meanwhile, high‑value builders such as Fun N Sun Pools and Watercrest Pools demonstrated the strength of the luxury segment.

In our upcoming market review later this week, we will explore the broader statewide trends—including the 31% month‑over‑month increase. For now, this pool builder snapshot provides construction professionals with a clear, data‑driven view of who’s leading the charge in Texas pool construction.

Texas Homebuilding Leaders: August 2026

Posted on September 11, 2026 by Erika Carruth

If you work in residential construction, you already know that permit data is the early indicator of market velocity, competitive pressure, pricing trends, and, in practical terms, which builders are securing the strongest competitive position in each metro. As reported earlier this week, and based on the latest HBW residential construction permit reports, Texas recorded 6,497 new permits in August 2026, representing more than $2.3 billion in total construction value. That’s not simply a busy month—it’s emblematic of Texas’ robust construction cadence.

Earlier this week, we broke down the statewide permit totals by region. Today, we are zooming in on the top home builders in each of the four major metros—Houston, Dallas, Austin, and San Antonio—to see who is leading the charge, who is gaining ground, and who may be building an empire one permit at a time.

Statewide Titans: The Top Builders Across All Four Metros

Before we go metro‑by‑metro, it is worth taking a moment to acknowledge the statewide heavyweights. When you aggregate permits across all four regions, three builders rise unmistakably to the top:

Lennar Homes (576 permits) – The perennial powerhouse, leading Texas with the highest total permit count statewide, posting strong numbers in every metro and topping two of them.
D.R. Horton (560 permits) – A close contender, leading Texas with the second-highest total permit count statewide.
Perry Homes (355 permits) – Not the highest in volume, but consistently present in the top five across all major markets, with some of the highest average values.

The top three firms are doing more than just participating in the Texas market—they are continuing to shape it, and when we take a closer look at the regional activity, several other builders take top spots on the leaderboard.

Houston: The Permit Capital of Texas

Houston continues to be the gravitational center of Texas homebuilding activity, and August was no exception. With five builders posting triple‑digit permit counts, the region remains a battleground for volume, value, and market share.

Top 5 Builders – Houston

D.R. Horton – 372 permits | $103.6M total value | Avg. value: $278,489
Lennar Homes – 308 permits | $78.0M total value | Avg. value: $253,421
Perry Homes – 180 permits | $60.8M total value | Avg. value: $337,631
David Weekley Homes – 168 permits | $53.1M total value | Avg. value: $316,089
Westin Homes – 91 permits | $28.3M total value | Avg. value: $310,886

The data for Houston shows a classic Texas pattern: D.R. Horton and Lennar dominate the volume game, while Perry and Weekley push the upper end of construction value. Westin rounds out the top five with strong average values, proving that quality and price point can hold their own even without triple‑digit permit counts.

Dallas: A Market Where Value Flexes Its Muscles

Dallas is always a fascinating study because it blends high‑volume production builders with premium‑value specialists.

Top 5 Builders – Dallas

Lennar Homes – 167 permits | $54.4M total value | Avg. value: $325,582
D.R. Horton – 143 permits | $42.4M total value | Avg. value: $296,662
Trophy Signature Homes – 111 permits | $42.9M total value | Avg. value: $386,778
Perry Homes – 92 permits | $31.8M total value | Avg. value: $345,893
Bloomfield Homes – 86 permits | $41.9M total value | Avg. value: $487,716

Dallas is the only metro where the highest average value out of the top five builders belongs to a builder outside the statewide top three; Bloomfield Homes posted an eye‑catching average of nearly half a million dollars per permit—proof that Dallas buyers continue to invest in higher‑end product. Trophy Signature also delivered strong value metrics, reinforcing the region’s appetite for premium builds.

Austin: A High‑Value Epicenter

Austin’s market has long been known for its elevated price points, and August’s permit data reinforces that reputation. Even builders with modest permit counts posted some of the highest average values statewide.

Top 5 Builders – Austin

Lennar Homes – 67 permits | $15.0M total value | Avg. value: $223,804
Perry Homes – 52 permits | $29.5M total value | Avg. value: $567,175
Taylor Morrison Homes – 51 permits | $18.3M total value | Avg. value: $359,386
KB Homes – 46 permits | $17.8M total value | Avg. value: $385,919
Pulte Homes – 41 permits | $13.5M total value | Avg. value: $329,535

Last month, Austin was Perry Homes’ playground. Their average value—over $567K—is the highest of any top five builder in any metro for the month. While Lennar Homes leads in volume, Perry clearly leads in price point, signaling strong demand for luxury and semi‑custom product in the Austin area.

San Antonio: A Balanced, Steady Market

San Antonio’s August numbers show a more evenly distributed market, with no single builder dramatically outpacing the others in volume.

Top 5 Builders – San Antonio

Lennar Homes – 34 permits | $9.0M total value | Avg. value: $264,568
Chesmar Homes – 33 permits | $11.7M total value | Avg. value: $355,557
Perry Homes – 31 permits | $10.6M total value | Avg. value: $342,406
M/I Homes – 26 permits | $7.45M total value | Avg. value: $286,659
D.R. Horton – 26 permits | $6.68M total value | Avg. value: $257,048

San Antonio’s top builders are tightly clustered, making it one of the most competitive metros in the state. Lennar Homes leads in volume, but Chesmar Homes edges out the competition in both total and average value.

Cross‑Metro Standouts

Several builders secured top‑five positions across multiple metropolitan areas, underscoring their broad market reach and competitive strength. Lennar Homes and Perry Homes distinguished themselves with appearances in all four major Texas metros, while D.R. Horton demonstrated similarly expansive coverage with top‑five placements in Houston, Dallas, and San Antonio. Such cross‑market visibility reflects substantial operational scale, diversified land strategies, and the capacity to tailor product offerings to varied demographic and economic conditions across the state.

It’s true that permit data can serve as a scoreboard, but more importantly, it serves as a strategic asset. The figures from August offer a clear view of the forces shaping the Texas residential market. Competition remains intense, particularly in Houston and Dallas, where high‑volume builders continue to dominate activity. At the same time, premium product is flourishing, most notably in Austin and select pockets of Dallas, where average construction values sit well above statewide norms. The monthly report also reinforces the importance of market diversification; builders operating across multiple metros are better insulated from regional fluctuations and shifts in demand. Pricing pressure is evident as well, with elevated average values suggesting a combination of rising construction costs and increasingly sophisticated buyer expectations. For builders, suppliers, and industry strategists, such data can influence everything from land acquisition and labor planning to pricing models and product positioning. In a state where opportunity expands as fast as the skyline, data‑driven insight is the currency of competitive advantage.

Texas New Home Construction Surges in August 2026

Posted on September 10, 2026 by Erika Carruth

If you felt the ground rumbling in Texas last month, don’t worry—it wasn’t seismic activity. It was the sound of builders across the Lone Star State firing up their crews, sharpening their pencils, and pulling permits at a pace that would make even the most seasoned GC take a second look. According to the latest HBW residential construction data reports, Texas recorded 6,497 new permits in August 2026, representing more than $2.3 billion in total construction value. In comparison to July, new home construction has picked up at a notable pace, in the form of a 19% month‑over‑month increase.

Today, we are diving into the four major metros—Houston, Dallas, Austin, and San Antonio—to unpack where the action is hottest, which counties are driving the surge, and how construction values are stacking up. For builders, contractors, suppliers, and anyone who considers permit data a form of light reading, this is your August market pulse check.

Houston

For those following the HBW blog, it should come as no surprise that Houston held the greatest concentration of new home construction and led the pack last month.

Total Permits: 2,932
Total Construction Value: $936,411,768
Average Value of Construction: $319,376

Houston alone accounted for 45% of all new residential permits statewide, making it the undisputed epicenter of Texas homebuilding activity for the month. From a county perspective, there were two counties that carried more than 60 percent of all new construction in the area:

Harris County: Permits: 900 | Total Value: $346,692,127
Montgomery County: Permits: 957 | Total Value: $249,085,856

Montgomery County actually pulled more permits than Harris—nearly 33% of Houston’s total metro permits—a sign that suburban expansion continues to be the region’s growth engine. Harris County, meanwhile, delivered the highest total value, reflecting a mix of larger projects and higher‑end builds. Houston’s average value sits comfortably in the low to mid‑$300s, suggesting a balanced blend of production‑level homes and more customized builds. In short: Houston is busy, diversified, and still expanding outward like a contractor’s punch list on a Friday afternoon.

Dallas

Dallas landed second on the leaderboard in total permits but first in average construction value—because, well, it is Dallas.

Total Permits: 2,227
Total Construction Value: $921,710,188
Average Value: $413,880

The average value in Dallas is the highest among all four metros, signaling robust demand for larger homes, higher‑end finishes, or elevated land valuations across the region’s most competitive residential corridors. Dallas builders are clearly working on projects that require more than a starter‑home budget. From a county perspective, there were two counties where the majority of all new home construction took place last month:

Tarrant County: Permits: 726 | Total Value: $310,096,868
Collin County: Permits: 624 | Total Value: $226,807,397

Together, Tarrant and Collin counties represent 60% of Dallas’s total permit activity, with Tarrant leading both in volume and value. Collin County continues to be a magnet for new residential development, especially in fast‑growing communities where “new construction” is practically a neighborhood amenity. The combination of high permit volume and high average value in the Dallas area makes it the metro to watch for builders targeting premium markets.

Austin

Austin may not match Houston or Dallas in raw permit volume, but it continues to punch above its weight in construction value and consistency.

Total Permits: 840
Total Construction Value: $296,729,121
Average Value: $353,249

Austin’s average value is the second‑highest among the four metros, reflecting the region’s ongoing appetite for higher‑spec homes, modern designs, and the occasional project designed to meet the region’s preference for architecturally distinctive, showcase‑quality homes. Nearly all of the new home construction activity was concentrated in the following two counties last month:

Travis County: Permits: 406 | Total Value: $125,456,621
Williamson County: Permits: 353 | Total Value: $123,787,500

Travis and Williamson counties together account for 90% of Austin’s total permit activity, showing a tight concentration of development in the core and northern suburban corridors. Williamson County nearly matches Travis in total value despite fewer permits, hinting at slightly higher average project sizes or more upscale builds. Austin remains a market where design trends matter, buyers are willing to invest, and builders can expect steady demand.

San Antonio

San Antonio rounds out the list with fewer permits holding the lowest average value of construction—and a clear concentration of activity.

Total Permits: 498
Total Construction Value: $156,254,306
Average Value: $313,764

San Antonio’s average value is the lowest of the metros reviewed but somewhat competitive considering that it landed just below Houston’s and above many national averages. From a county perspective, there was one county that carried the bulk of new construction activity:

Bexar County: Permits: 285 | Total Value: $93,523,640

Bexar County accounts for 57% of all San Antonio permits, making it the dominant force in the metro’s residential construction landscape. The remaining activity is dispersed across surrounding counties, but Bexar remains the anchor.

Statewide Trends and Takeaways

While the permit activity for August reflects a healthy 19 percent uptick from the previous month, it is best understood as a momentary snapshot rather than a sweeping trend; even so, it does illustrate steady buyer demand and ongoing confidence among Texas builders. Houston continues to dominate statewide, accounting for nearly half of all new permits and reinforcing its role as the state’s most active residential construction hub. Dallas, meanwhile, distinguishes itself through its elevated average construction value of $413,880, underscoring the metro’s position as a premium market—particularly across Tarrant and Collin counties. Austin remains a reliably high‑value environment as well, with an average of $353,249 that speaks to the region’s enduring appetite for quality design and modern residential amenities. And although San Antonio posted the lowest permit volume among the four metros, its solid average values demonstrate that builders there are still delivering substantial projects. Together, the patterns paint a picture of a statewide market that is active, diversified, and steadily progressing across all major regions.